← Search

Emily Geurts

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
308 matches · 191W–117L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
60%
down to 4.0
40%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 37% down · 63% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.03. Higher than today’s 3.98 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.5
27 of 39
NV · 4.5
41 of 61

Emily is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has played at 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

3.03.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Emily has gone from the 2nd to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
71.2%
47W–19L · 58.7% of games
4.0
70.2%
99W–42L · 59.2% of games
4.5
46.6%
34W–39L · 48.5% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history308 matches
L
Katherine Olivier / Caitlin Murphy
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Brigitte Fallon
−0.020below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Tontapanish
−0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Amy Graybeal / Rachel Calderon Young
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brigitte Fallon
−0.023below expectation — took 55% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Leslie Gallant / V Kate Ferguson
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannan Ohlson
+0.014better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Chelsea Loomis / Christine Blake
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lucy Twohy
−0.045below expectation — took 48% of games against 64% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Rachel Calderon Young / Amy Graybeal
2026-03-27 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Navin
−0.013below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Devon Allgower / V Kate Ferguson
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lucy Twohy
+0.035better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Christine Blake / Amanda Zommick
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannan Ohlson
+0.052better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Lesley Chan / Camille Solla
2026-02-27 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Navin
+0.073better than expected — took 63% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Stacey Carney / Morgan Daley
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lucy Twohy
+0.028better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lucy Twohy
−0.009about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brigitte Fallon
+0.024better than expected — took 60% of games against 49% expected
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.