← Search

Nicole Navin

KELLER, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 146W–112L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Nicole Navin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history258 matches
L
2026-03-27 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Geurts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-13 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Bucquet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-28 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Haines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-02-27 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Geurts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-21 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peggy Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-20 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kendalyn Hartsock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-02-06 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #2 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Tontapanish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-31 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Haines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-17 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Haines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-01-10 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tina Back
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-19 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Unick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-01 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Pishko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
69%
69W–31L · 57.1% of games
4.5
37.7%
26W–43L · 44.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 53.4% of games
8.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.9% of games
9.0mixed
54.5%
18W–15L · 53.1% of games
9.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
63 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer