Search

Tina Back

Henderson, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
407 matches · 314W–93L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 4.0
93%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 5% down · 95% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.13. Higher than today’s 4.12 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 4.5
5 of 16
NV · 4.5
20 of 61

Tina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tina has played at 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

3.03.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Tina has gone from the 55th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level13 levels played
2.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 69% of games
3.0
87.2%
34W–5L · 73.4% of games
3.5
88.1%
59W–8L · 65.7% of games
4.0
80.7%
113W–27L · 63.1% of games
4.5
60.8%
31W–20L · 51.5% of games
5.0
80%
4W–1L · 62.9% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.4% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.4% of games
7.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 62.7% of games
8.0mixed
62.2%
23W–14L · 56.2% of games
8.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.3% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history407 matches
W
Belinda Smith / Devon Allgower
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Anne Martz
0.015below expectation — took 56% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thalia Vidal Roper
+0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Teresa McMillan / Jaclyn Bermudez
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brigitte Fallon
0.003about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Mary Lynn Weber / April Denise Belcher
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Devon Allgower
0.019below expectation — took 43% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Katherine Olivier / Catherine Pfarrer
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thalia Vidal Roper
0.014below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Brigitte Fallon / Amanda Chen
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thalia Vidal Roper
0.002about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Christa Casper / Carri Geer-Thevenot
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Martz
0.024below expectation — took 55% of games against 63% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Gillian Lee / Caitlin Leechamps
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · with Rachel Calderon Young
+0.006about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Holly Shortenhaus / Dina Dulaneychamps
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · with Brigitte Fallon
+0.034better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-28 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.001better than expected — took 86% of games against 74% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thalia Vidal Roper
+0.054better than expected — took 59% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Teresa McMillan / Margaretha Breytenbach
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brigitte Fallon
+0.023better than expected — took 60% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.