← Search

Anne Martz

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
245 matches · 180W–65L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Anne Martz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history245 matches
W
2026-09-10 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Geurts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-09 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with McKenzie Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Geurts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-18 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Back
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-06 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Geurts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tina Back
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-01 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karin Fuire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-24 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacqueline Prestileo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brigitte Fallon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS #1 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Haines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 71.8% of games
3.5
86.5%
32W–5L · 64.7% of games
4.0
82.9%
63W–13L · 63.9% of games
4.5
53.6%
37W–32L · 52.6% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 51% of games
8.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 53% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
98 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
35 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
8 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe