Search

Lucy Twohy

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
334 matches · 233W–101L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.21
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
100%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.5
7 of 39
NV · 4.5
10 of 61

Lucy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lucy has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Lucy has gone from the 81st to the 80th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
4.0
81.4%
35W–8L · 61.8% of games
4.5
75.6%
102W–33L · 59.5% of games
5.0
60%
3W–2L · 54% of games
7.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 52.9% of games
8.5mixed
71.9%
23W–9L · 59.8% of games
9.0mixed
62.9%
22W–13L · 53.3% of games
9.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history334 matches
L
Katherine Olivier / Catherine Pfarrer
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brigitte Fallon
0.019below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Christa Casper / Lan Duong
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Tontapanish
0.022below expectation — took 60% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Morgan Daley / Katherine Olivier
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Murphy
+0.016better than expected — took 58% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Anne Martz / Kim Haines
2026-04-17 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarine Weingarten Garcia
0.016below expectation — took 52% of games against 59% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Mae Loftus / Annie Nicksick
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hillary Hall
+0.005better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Chelsea Loomis / Christine Blake
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Geurts
0.045below expectation — took 48% of games against 64% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
April Denise Belcher / V Kate Ferguson
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hillary Hall
0.034below expectation — took 59% of games against 69% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-03-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Tontapanish
+0.019better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Devon Allgower / V Kate Ferguson
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Geurts
+0.035better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarine Weingarten Garcia
+0.012better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Christa Casper / Mary Lynn Weber
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa Williams
+0.026better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Stacey Carney / Morgan Daley
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Geurts
+0.028better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.