Search

Leslie Gallant

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
233 matches · 128W–105L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
100%
down to 4.0
0%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 94% down · 6% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.88. Higher than today’s 3.78 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.5
37 of 39
NV · 4.5
58 of 61

Leslie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Leslie has been a steady 4.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Leslie has gone from the 30th to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
55.7%
107W–85L · 52.1% of games
5.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 58.8% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history233 matches
L
Margaretha Breytenbach / Teresa McMillan
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Sutter
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Amy Graybeal / Glenda Li
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Sutter
0.023below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Brigitte Fallon / Kim Haines
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Sutter
0.003below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karin Fuire
+0.027better than expected — took 37% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with V Kate Ferguson
0.014below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marrian Fujinami
+0.015better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-30 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kimberly Taeubel
0.023about as expected — took 57% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
Kayla Blum / Gabrielle Brucker
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Zommick
0.002about as expected — took 39% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aida Tracy
+0.017about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Amy Graybeal / Glenda Li
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindsey Lanni
0.028below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karin Fuire
0.019below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Haines
0.089below expectation — took 0% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.