← Search

Kayla Blum

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
307 matches · 192W–115L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
73 of 129
NV · 4.0
102 of 203

Kayla is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kayla has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kayla has gone from the 11th to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 67.1% of games
3.5
67.9%
38W–18L · 59% of games
4.0
60%
111W–74L · 53.6% of games
4.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history307 matches
L
Jenny Grob / Christine Blake
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Candra Milohnic
+0.009about as expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · with Jonna Gilmore
−0.016below expectation — took 40% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · with Josephine McPeak
−0.039below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Belinda Smith / April Denise Belcher
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carri Geer-Thevenot
−0.004about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Susan Norris / Maria Gonzales
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Guiliano
+0.002about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Julie Tontapanish / Hillary Hall
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carri Geer-Thevenot
−0.021below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Anne Gumm / Christina Rich
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candy Rosenberg
+0.006better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christa Casper
−0.006below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Brynn Roberts / Samantha Schwartz
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Bosnos
+0.008about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Alred
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Gayl Fitzgerald / Anahi Sanchez
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josephine McPeak
+0.038better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Amy Nhaisi / Diane Welch
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anahi Sanchez
−0.007about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.