← Search

Candy Rosenberg

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
360 matches · 256W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Candy Rosenberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history360 matches
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · SPANISH TRAIL · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-05-30 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Sinnock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-11 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kayla Blum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-11 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aleksei Zilberman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-04 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bing Zou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wael Eid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
82.3%
51W–11L · 70.6% of games
3.5
92.3%
36W–3L · 70.5% of games
4.0
75.9%
129W–41L · 62.1% of games
4.5
28%
7W–18L · 39% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 78.7% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.7% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 34.8% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
110 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
46 matches
#2 Singles
5%
19 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe