Search

Alex Farley Messer

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
420 matches · 223W–197L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.70
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
69 of 129
NV · 4.0
96 of 203

Alex is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alex has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Alex has gone from the 33rd to the 75th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 55.4% of games
4.0
64.2%
102W–57L · 54% of games
4.5
30.8%
24W–54L · 43% of games
5.0
40%
2W–3L · 51.6% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.8% of games
7.5mixed
80%
16W–4L · 62.4% of games
8.0mixed
55.3%
26W–21L · 53.7% of games
8.5mixed
32.1%
9W–19L · 43.6% of games
9.0mixed
30%
6W–14L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history420 matches
L
Audrey Chin / Miguel Ubilluzmixed
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zack Messer
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Jules Mitchell
2026-07-06 · #1 Female Singles · 4.0
0.016below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Audrey Chinchamps
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles
+0.041better than expected — took 60% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Karin de Amicis
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.012better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · with Tom Gosnell
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Enhua Chen / Kara Godfreychamps
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · with Daigo Ishikawa
0.032below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rajeev Sharma
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Nora Taylor
2026-05-16 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.029better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Adam Barr / Chloe Dillingmixed
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Zack Messer
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Sarah Merwin / Mimi Liu
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brynn Roberts
0.048below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Scott Baker / Rachel Calderon Youngmixed
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rajeev Sharma
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.