← Search

Jason Schieck

Henderson, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 150W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Schieck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
W
2026-09-02 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valerie Witherspoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
Phillip Chase / Candra Milohnic
2026-08-23 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christine DeLisle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Drea Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christine DeLisle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valerie Witherspoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
Phillip Chase / Sharon Jimenez
2026-07-19 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Drea Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · with Mari K Bradley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · with Mari K Bradley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-23 · DTC · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-17 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mari K Bradley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-16 · DTC · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-09 · DTC · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
71.7%
43W–17L · 58.7% of games
4.5
46.2%
24W–28L · 48.1% of games
5.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 42.4% of games
7.0mixed
100%
13W–0L · 69.8% of games
7.5mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 68% of games
8.0mixed
62.9%
22W–13L · 55.1% of games
8.5mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
102 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
52 matches
#1 Singles
7%
17 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer