Search

Drea Jones

LAS VEGAS, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
196 matches · 149W–47L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
LAS VEGAS · 4.0
4 of 11
NV · 4.0
51 of 203

Drea is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Drea has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Drea has gone from the 57th to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.5
85.7%
24W–4L · 65.3% of games
4.0
75.4%
46W–15L · 60.9% of games
4.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.6% of games
7.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 62.9% of games
7.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 62% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
15W–3L · 64.5% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history196 matches
W
Amanda Zommick / Karin de Amicis
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lan Duong
+0.041better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Phillip Chase / Sharon Jimenezmixed
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jason Schieck
+0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Kristi Pishko / Nevin Sahnimixed
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mike Fitzpatrick
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Lan Duong
0.042below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Carla Eggleston / Christi Lin
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Graybeal
+0.010better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-07 · #2 Doubles · with Lan Duong
+0.015better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaclyn Bermudez
0.092below expectation — took 8% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
N/Amixed
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Oliver Tokay
+0.000about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daigo Ishikawa
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Jimenez
0.012about as expected — took 59% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Barbara Fair / Ruth-Ann Edwards
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lan Duong
+0.011better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaclyn Bermudez
0.030below expectation — took 52% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.