← Search

Kelly Elwart

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 112W–30L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kelly Elwart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
W
2026-09-08 · TPC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Candra Milohnic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-30 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandynn Elwart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-25 · TPC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hayley Hollander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-18 · TPC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katelyn McCullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · DTC #3 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandynn Elwart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-13 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Lefebvre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-06 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannan Ohlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · TPC #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Lanni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandynn Elwart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandynn Elwart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · DTC #3 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandynn Elwart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayley Hollander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
88.9%
40W–5L · 71.6% of games
3.5
83.3%
25W–5L · 72.1% of games
4.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 59.4% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 76.3% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.5% of games
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 69.2% of games
7.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 61% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert