← Search

Kathryn Garlan

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
446 matches · 240W–206L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.39
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 33 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
92%
stay 3.5
8%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.33. Lower than today’s 3.39 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
48 of 139
NV · 3.5
64 of 228

Kathryn is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kathryn has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Kathryn has gone from the 80th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
72.3%
125W–48L · 59.2% of games
4.0
31.5%
45W–98L · 44.5% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 50% of games
8.0
40%
4W–6L · 43.3% of games
7.0mixed
45.8%
11W–13L · 51% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
22W–11L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
40.6%
13W–19L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history446 matches
L
Billi Dunning / Susan Norris
2026-07-23 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Mimi Liu
+0.018better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Stephanie Chen / Enhua Chenmixed
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Josiah Garlan
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Margret Winter / Jeffrey Parlesmixed
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Josiah Garlan
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Valerie Murphy / Susan Norris
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Richards
+0.010better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Mercedes Renteria IV / Shellene Goudgemixed
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lance Allgower
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mimi Liu
−0.014about as expected — took 75% of games against 71% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Prexy Tamayo / James Strassermixed
2026-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Adam Neubauer
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Maryann Goodsell / Elizabeth Hansen
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Little
−0.045below expectation — took 8% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Christine Ballard / Kelly Kedge
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mimi Liu
+0.013better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Melissa Kwong-Blais / Jennifer Jameson
2026-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Maier
+0.005about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Jack Stevens / Michaela Stevensmixed
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Hollander
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Gumberg
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.