Search

Marijo Peterson

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
202 matches · 103W–99L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
46 of 129
NV · 4.0
67 of 203

Marijo is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marijo has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Marijo has gone from the 41st to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 63.2% of games
4.0
50%
48W–48L · 50.9% of games
4.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 42.8% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
59.3%
16W–11L · 54.9% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.8% of games
9.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history202 matches
W
Vanessa Nicole Rowe / Treasure Nyamemixed
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tam Vu
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Christine Blake / Katherine Yokoyama
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Marx
+0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shellene Goudge
0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Nguyen
+0.116better than expected — took 68% of games against 29% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Camilla Wells / Jessica Berger
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shellene Goudge
+0.012about as expected — took 42% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ross
0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Sharon Jimenez / Kristi Pishko
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shellene Goudge
+0.059better than expected — took 62% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Marx
0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ross
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Jessica Berger / Camilla Wells
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Marx
0.021below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Mary Stephenson
2026-02-28 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.019below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Kelly McPherson / Tomas Reyes Castellanosmixed
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Tarantan
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.