Search

Stephanie McGregor

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
65 matches · 27W–38L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 3.0
93%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
117 of 139
NV · 3.5
199 of 228

Stephanie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stephanie has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Stephanie has gone from the 27th to the 85th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
54.5%
12W–10L · 53.8% of games
3.5
32.3%
10W–21L · 45.6% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.1% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mari Valvo
+0.007about as expected — took 45% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
Mimi Liu / Kathryn Garlan
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mari Valvo
+0.014about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Knotts
+0.010about as expected — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-12-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joeanna Parker
+0.023better than expected — took 48% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Alisun Vehar / Gina Case
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joeanna Parker
0.047below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-11-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn McNulty
0.009about as expected — took 40% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn McNulty
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Misti Webb / Kathryn Garlan
2025-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andi Berger
0.045below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn McNulty
0.008below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joeanna Parker
+0.010about as expected — took 45% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Kerri Comings / Joan Perricone
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joeanna Parker
0.018below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Denise Mandelbaum / Michelle Elliott
2025-09-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Jolly
+0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.