← Search

Hayley Rodes

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
571 matches · 324W–247L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Hayley Rodes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history571 matches
L
2026-08-10 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Female Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Brynn Roberts / Megan Bell
2026-08-03 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Howser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Song
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Samantha Schwartz
2026-07-13 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Female Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Howser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-27 · RED ROCK CC #4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Song
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-20 · RED ROCK CC #4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-06 · RED ROCK CC #4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 73.2% of games
3.5
68.7%
206W–94L · 56.7% of games
4.0
27%
34W–92L · 40.7% of games
6.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
56.2%
18W–14L · 53.9% of games
7.5mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
48.4%
15W–16L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
208 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
143 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
112 matches
#1 Singles
8%
43 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
19 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer