Search

Hayley Rodes

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
569 matches · 324W–245L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.45
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
72%
stay 3.5
28%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.38. Lower than today’s 3.45 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
30 of 139
NV · 3.5
36 of 228

Hayley is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Hayley has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Hayley has gone from the 83rd to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 73.2% of games
3.5
68.7%
206W–94L · 56.7% of games
4.0
27.4%
34W–90L · 40.8% of games
6.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
56.2%
18W–14L · 53.9% of games
7.5mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
48.4%
15W–16L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history569 matches
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Howser
0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Sonia Vermeys / Maria Gonzales
2026-07-23 · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Song
+0.007about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Samantha Schwartz
2026-07-13 · #1 Female Singles · 4.0
0.018below expectation — took 8% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-06 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Howser
+0.015about as expected — took 41% of games against 37% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.011better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Timora Cereghino / Pam Kirkendall
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Song
0.002about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Jamie Johnson / Arika Carrier
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
+0.008about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Loc Nguyen
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Jennifer Blais / Leticia Schoff
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
0.027below expectation — took 56% of games against 65% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Sarah Perez
2026-04-25 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.017below expectation — took 56% of games against 61% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Jill Morrison / Megan Galli
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hall
+0.013better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hall
+0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.