Search

Timora Cereghino

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
264 matches · 102W–162L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
85 of 139
NV · 3.5
133 of 228

Timora is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Timora has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Timora has gone from the 8th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
25%
5W–15L · 39.8% of games
4.0
35.7%
56W–101L · 46.6% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 55.8% of games
8.0
45.5%
20W–24L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history264 matches
W
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Beckwith
+0.021better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Kirkendall
+0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Joann Komanowski / Denise Mandelbaum
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith MacKenzie
0.007below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Tegano
+0.030better than expected — took 62% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cappi Bates
0.009below expectation — took 50% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Tegano
+0.020better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Alba
+0.002about as expected — took 39% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Anne Kellogg / Karrie Bennallack
2026-04-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Kirkendall
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Spelman
+0.035better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Diane Sanders / Carolyn Wood
2026-03-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arlene Babbitt
0.050below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Megan Meyers / Mimi Liu
2026-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Kirkendall
0.041below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Krista Kabacy / Debbie Hicks
2026-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Cortez
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.