Search

Cappi Bates

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
151 matches · 66W–85L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.18
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
106 of 139
NV · 3.5
177 of 228

Cappi is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cappi has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Cappi has gone from the 39th to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
41.1%
39W–56L · 47.7% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
24W–24L · 50.1% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history151 matches
W
Michele Howser / Misti Webb
2026-05-27 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Horns
+0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
Jennifer Blais / Michelle Simister
2026-05-20 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Horns
0.012about as expected — took 54% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timora Cereghino
0.009below expectation — took 50% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jill Morrison / Sheri Cherubino
2026-04-15 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Kirkendall
0.056below expectation — took 25% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Suni Chabrow / Kelly McPherson
2026-04-08 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Horns
+0.012better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Kay Patel / Linda Hawkes
2026-02-18 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie D'Amato
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Andra Starr Scano / Gina Case
2026-02-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Cortez
+0.024better than expected — took 61% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Tina Nathalia / Skye Alleman
2026-02-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timora Cereghino
0.022below expectation — took 45% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Katerina Selland / Hong Lee
2026-01-28 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Cortez
+0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Cindi Ray / Juli Kochanski
2025-11-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Horns
+0.016better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Tanya Syme / Julie Hughes
2025-10-08 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Zobrist
+0.049better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2025-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Popek
+0.023better than expected — took 100% of games against 74% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.