Search

Tanya Syme

WALNUT CREEK, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
188 matches · 93W–95L · seasons 20192025
Where Tanya sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Tanya is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tanya has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Tanya has gone from the 39th to the 62nd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
68.3%
28W–13L · 55.5% of games
3.5
46%
52W–61L · 48.8% of games
4.0
39.3%
11W–17L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history188 matches
W
Donna Lefever / Melissa Hicks
2025-12-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Garlan
+0.031better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Howser
0.023below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Loc Nguyen / Lisa Krzyzaniak
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Howser
0.006about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Howser
+0.006about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Kirsten Ingram / Gina Case
2025-10-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
+0.045better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-10-08 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Hughes
0.049below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Courtney Long / Melissa Hicks
2025-10-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Britney Jensen
+0.004better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-09-24 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hall
+0.017better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-09-22 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shanna Toft
0.014below expectation — took 8% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Hong Lee / Heather Childs
2025-09-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Howser
+0.007better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Erika Moore / EMELIA ALLEN
2025-08-18 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Howser
+0.028better than expected — took 58% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Andra Starr Scano / Allison Festa
2025-08-04 · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Mimi Liu
0.009about as expected — took 60% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.