← Search

Shanna Toft

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
281 matches · 171W–110L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Shanna Toft to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history281 matches
L
2026-09-08 · TPC #1 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Travis Azous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · TPC #1 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Lind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Samantha Schwartz
2026-08-10 · CANYON GATE · #1 Female Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Amy Berghold / Maria King
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Travis Azous championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Katherine Bleth
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Taylor Reynolds / Kylie Sumpter
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Mary Lind championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · TPC #1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Lind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · CANYON GATE · #1 Female Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Loc Nguyen / Megan Bell
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · with Travis Azous championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
62.2%
23W–14L · 57.4% of games
3.0
57.1%
44W–33L · 55.1% of games
3.5
66.4%
71W–36L · 57.5% of games
4.0
46.4%
13W–15L · 46.5% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.8% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 21% of the time
#1 Singles
21%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
44 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
27 matches
#1 Female Singles
5%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova