← Search

Jan Willis

HENDERSON, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
414 matches · 174W–240L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.34
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 53 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
HENDERSON · 3.5
3 of 5
NV · 3.5
79 of 228

Jan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jan has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jan has gone from the 19th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.5
51.7%
46W–43L · 52% of games
4.0
34.9%
67W–125L · 44.1% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 40% of games
7.0
75.6%
34W–11L · 61.3% of games
8.0
25%
6W–18L · 41.3% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.8% of games
7.5mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
35%
7W–13L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history414 matches
W
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Dexter
+0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Mike Little / Jules Mitchellmixed
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeff Ng
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Jamie Kelvington / Maria Allenchamps
2026-06-17 · #3 Doubles · with Joann Komanowski
−0.038below expectation — took 37% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Christi Lin / Dawn Andersonchamps
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · with Joann Komanowski
−0.020below expectation — took 35% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.027below expectation — took 42% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
Anne Gumm / Catherine Perez
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Courville
−0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
7-6
L
Darlene Whittlesy / Tracy Jones
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Perricone
−0.022below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Perricone
+0.011better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-05-11 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Wellman
+0.021better than expected — took 100% of games against 75% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Nancy Holland / Kelly Kedge
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Ryba
+0.027better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Debbie Hicks / Joni Kerby
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Dexter
−0.015below expectation — took 48% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Sabine Curtis / Karen Miller
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hong Lee
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.