Search

Emily Courville

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
170 matches · 73W–97L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
55 of 139
NV · 3.5
84 of 228

Emily is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams54 teams · 2009–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emily has been 3.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Emily has gone from the 15th to the 31st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
48.2%
67W–72L · 51.5% of games
4.0
24%
6W–19L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history170 matches
L
Anne Gumm / Catherine Perez
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Willis
0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
7-6
L
Melissa Kwong-Blais / Nicole Reyes
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Petrie
+0.032better than expected — took 44% of games against 34% expected
7-6, 3-2
W
Misti Webb / Amanda Gumberg
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilyn Fenn
+0.034better than expected — took 59% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Rika Cook / Nancy Holland
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Vanderford
0.007about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Amy Rogers / Christina Rich
2026-02-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Willis
+0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Shanna Toft / Julie MacDonald
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Willis
+0.008about as expected — took 32% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
N/A
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Petrie
+0.001better than expected — took 100% of games against 83% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with PJ Shouldis
+0.043better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Rachael Boyle / Ashly Ryan
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Vanderford
0.065below expectation — took 25% of games against 57% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-11-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rose Gerrard
0.062below expectation — took 35% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-10-25 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.046about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Rowena Messner / Nicole Nestman
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Dexter
+0.017better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.