← Search

Ashly Ryan

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
59 matches · 36W–23L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Ashly sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Ashly is one of 1627 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 67% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ashly has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Ashly has gone from the 28th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
91.3%
21W–2L · 70.4% of games
3.5
42.4%
14W–19L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history59 matches
L
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leticia Schoff
−0.003about as expected — took 39% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liliya Pummill
−0.113below expectation — took 14% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachael Boyle
+0.066better than expected — took 75% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Jerri Blutman / Tanya Hale
2025-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachael Boyle
+0.016about as expected — took 37% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Wood
−0.031below expectation — took 42% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-10-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber Candelaria
−0.036below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Susan Gray / Michelle Jarvis
2025-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Lenhart
+0.002about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
Jaclyn O'Malley / Mary Stephenson
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachael Boyle
−0.016below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Roxane Kazarian / Diane Paull
2022-12-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Ibarguen
+0.051better than expected — took 65% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Lauren Phillips / Teryn Mendenhall
2022-11-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachael Boyle
−0.009about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Kimberly Lukasiak / Linda Briggs
2022-11-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanessa Nicole Rowe
−0.005about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Amy Link / Susan Castelli
2022-11-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Ibarguen
−0.020below expectation — took 32% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.