← Search

Leticia Schoff

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
267 matches · 137W–130L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.17
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 59 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
2%
stay 3.0
98%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 29% stay · 71% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.04. Lower than today’s 3.17 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
14 of 134
NV · 3.0
18 of 166

Leticia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Leticia has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Leticia has gone from the 16th to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
3.0
63.8%
44W–25L · 55.6% of games
3.5
38.3%
23W–37L · 45.2% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.9% of games
6.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 56.9% of games
6.5mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
51.2%
22W–21L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 36.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history267 matches
W
2026-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Nathalia
+0.019better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Tori Walker / Laura Madsen
2026-07-15 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Ruediger
−0.021about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Christina Smith / Jeralyn Marchesi
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Prexy Tamayo
−0.013below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Derek Clotfelter / Allyssandra Prodoehlmixed
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gary Roeben
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Springer
+0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Charlotte Durisseau / Maureen Kelly
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeralyn Marchesi
−0.019about as expected — took 75% of games against 73% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Prexy Tamayo / STEPHANE BIRYmixed
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kendall Stowe
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Heather Hartzell / Dan Michalskimixed
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Norman Wu
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Ruediger
+0.017better than expected — took 58% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Kelli Caderot / Hee Park
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeralyn Marchesi
−0.030about as expected — took 86% of games against 85% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Ramona Acosta / Jack Stevensmixed
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Sherer
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Elizabeth Eshragh / George Baggottmixed
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Norman Wu
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.