Search

Michael Bauwens

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
224 matches · 132W–92L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.24
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 35 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
0%
stay 3.0
100%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 11% stay · 89% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.10. Lower than today’s 3.24 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
5 of 134
NV · 3.0
8 of 166

Michael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has been a steady 3.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Michael has gone from the 81st to the 100th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
81%
64W–15L · 66% of games
3.5
43.8%
21W–27L · 46.5% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.9% of games
6.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 61.6% of games
6.5mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 41.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.7% of games
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 63% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history224 matches
L
Mark Joseph Apostol / Venetia Espinuevamixed
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Schnitz
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Darrell Luzzo / Mitch Baron
2026-07-23 · #2 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Dali
+0.041better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Ivan Farris / James Nassar
2026-07-16 · #2 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Brancato
+0.020better than expected — took 47% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Tony Auston / Ashley Bryngelsonchamps
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Alexandria Chang
0.019below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Andrew Kop / Stephanie Sabgachamps
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Schnitz
0.032below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Dhruvan Gopinath / Jamie Harrischamps
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Schnitz
+0.017better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Brandynn Elwart / Ryan Marchesichamps
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with Jordan Raub
0.007about as expected — took 40% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Ryan Marchesi / Alex Krestonchamps
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · with Antonio Ventura
0.049below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
David Dellett / John Roehm
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Antonio Ventura
+0.042better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Joseph Engle / Kristin Stowechamps
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Schnitz
0.021below expectation — took 52% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Paul Mazur / Gil Ophir
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Brancato
0.022about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Schnitz
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.