← Search

Brian Brancato

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
393 matches · 220W–173L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.13
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
5%
stay 3.0
95%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 43% stay · 57% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.01. Lower than today’s 3.13 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
19 of 134
NV · 3.0
23 of 166

Brian is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Brian has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Brian has gone from the 1st to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
3.0
55.4%
92W–74L · 51.4% of games
3.5
39.5%
17W–26L · 49.5% of games
4.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.4% of games
6.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 53.6% of games
5.5mixed
69.2%
18W–8L · 60.9% of games
6.0mixed
67.4%
29W–14L · 55.8% of games
6.5mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 44.7% of games
7.0mixed
31.6%
6W–13L · 46.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history393 matches
L
David Ponte / Prexy Tamayomixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christi Lin
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Chris Rasmussen / John Ritz
2026-07-23 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Castro
+0.047better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Ivan Farris / James Nassar
2026-07-16 · #2 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Bauwens
+0.020better than expected — took 47% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Jennifer Cook / Gordon Smithchamps
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Elena Bolha
+0.045better than expected — took 71% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Yarisbel Schieck
−0.014below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Robert Erisch / Howard Rosenblatt
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan Fish
−0.004about as expected — took 65% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Linda Ono / Sean Onochamps
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · with Yarisbel Schieck
+0.031better than expected — took 59% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Paul Mazur / Gil Ophir
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Bauwens
−0.022about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Jeralyn Marchesi / Ryan Marchesimixed
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Ross
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Matthew Terry / Abraham Ibarra
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Antonio Ventura
+0.005better than expected — took 68% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Ashley Richas / Terry Hulsemixed
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Schnitz
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Robert Carlson / Gary Roeben
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Miller
−0.015below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.