← Search

Hugo Olivares-Ponce

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
111 matches · 71W–40L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 39 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
58%
stay 3.0
42%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 88% stay · 12% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.98 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
10 of 29
NV · 3.0
75 of 193

Hugo is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Hugo has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Hugo has gone from the 83rd to the 71st percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
78.7%
37W–10L · 60.9% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 44% of games
6.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 65.2% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history111 matches
L
STEPHANE BIRY / Stephen Gruner
2026-07-30 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Brancato
−0.015below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Justin Menard
2026-07-23 · #1 Male Singles · 3.5
−0.021below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Bill Bosnos / Keith Stritt
2026-07-16 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Nabil Nassri
+0.036better than expected — took 40% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
William Gaughan / Priscilla Gaughanmixed
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caroline Walton
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Patrik Martinet / Jennifer Hemlychamps
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Yarisbel Schieck
−0.013below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Teddy Ton / Tina Nathaliachamps
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Prexy Tamayo
−0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Hailey Mann / Nick Arismendichamps
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Elena Bolha
+0.020better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Pat Flynnchamps
2026-06-18 · #2 Singles
−0.025below expectation — took 42% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Drew Saldanachamps
2026-06-16 · #2 Singles
+0.033better than expected — took 56% of games against 40% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Richard Sacca
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.032better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Chong Choi
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.031below expectation — took 54% of games against 65% expected
7-6
W
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · with Prexy Tamayo
+0.008better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.