Search

Rachel Corpuz

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
95 matches · 48W–47L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 38 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
80%
stay 3.0
20%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.93 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
65 of 141
NV · 3.0
81 of 173

Rachel is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachel has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Rachel has gone from the 14th to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
45.8%
22W–26L · 48.8% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 31.3% of games
6.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.2% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.9% of games
8.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history95 matches
L
Carter Kessler / Shi L Oskooimixed
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rod Faircloth
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.082better than expected — took 75% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.029better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Robi Hinton / Chris Marlinmixed
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darren Rouvi
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.023below expectation — took 47% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Brandynn Elwart / Priscilla Gaughanmixed
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darren Rouvi
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Christie Sanders
2026-05-02 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.001about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Julie Smith / Angel Hinojosamixed
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darren Rouvi
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Jocelyn Herman / Brittany Carlson
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Blais
0.024below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Blais
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Karen Homchamps
2026-04-10 · #1 Singles
+0.018about as expected — took 37% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.