Search

Chelsi Grady

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
93 matches · 53W–40L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.87
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
95%
stay 3.0
5%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.82. Lower than today’s 2.87 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
92 of 134
NV · 3.0
111 of 166

Chelsi is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chelsi has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Chelsi has gone from the 9th to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.6% of games
3.0
56%
47W–37L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history93 matches
W
Kelley Candito / Meghan Arnold
2026-07-06 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Jacobs
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Jocelyn Herman / Genesis Garcia
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ziebarth
0.028below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Rachel Corpuz
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.025below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with ANN MARIE WEAVER
0.035below expectation — took 44% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Christina Smith / Melissa Blacker
2026-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shaza Nayef
0.014below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Gretchen Wills
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Golssa Moridi / Kimberly Yang
2026-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ziebarth
0.019below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Maria Lowry / Kim Knottschamps
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · with Crystal Ziebarth
0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Brianne Pepperman / Stacy Burr
2026-03-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Britten
0.010about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Laurie Lenhart / Debbie D'Amato
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ziebarth
+0.022better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Priscilla Gaughan / Lisa Gaughan
2026-03-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ziebarth
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Monica Taylor / Charlotte Durisseau
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ziebarth
+0.009better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.