← Search

Lisa Gaughan

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
113 matches · 49W–64L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.90
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 40 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
90%
stay 3.0
10%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.84. Lower than today’s 2.90 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
77 of 134
NV · 3.0
96 of 166

Lisa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lisa has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lisa has gone from the 33rd to the 30th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
62.1%
36W–22L · 56.1% of games
3.5
16%
4W–21L · 38.3% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 43.4% of games
6.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 39.2% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history113 matches
L
Elizabeth Pierce / Brenda Cambridge
2026-07-29 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Smith
−0.025below expectation — took 32% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Philip Lee
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
+0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Paige Song / Misti Webb
2026-05-20 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Brodie
−0.003about as expected — took 44% of games against 48% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brandynn Elwart
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Punam Patel
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Nicole Austin / Miriam Pasimio
2026-05-06 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Nestman
+0.017better than expected — took 46% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
Angela Zobrist / Tracey Allan
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tayoni Coleman
−0.003about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Rod Faircloth / Brandie Browningmixed
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Gaughan
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanna Toft
+0.002better than expected — took 100% of games against 82% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Diane Paull / Suni Chabrow
2026-04-22 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Brodie
+0.011better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Casey Primmer
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tayoni Coleman
−0.003about as expected — took 42% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.