← Search

Miriam Pasimio

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
275 matches · 145W–130L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
63 of 139
NV · 3.5
100 of 228

Miriam is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Miriam has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Miriam has gone from the 3rd to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.2% of games
3.0
65.2%
45W–24L · 56.5% of games
3.5
36.7%
33W–57L · 47.4% of games
4.0
20%
2W–8L · 36% of games
6.0
85%
17W–3L · 65.1% of games
7.0
61.5%
24W–15L · 54.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 37.5% of games
7.0mixed
40%
10W–15L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history275 matches
W
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Zimmerman
+0.027better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Austin
+0.030better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Racquel Toyozaki
−0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Alisia Pulella / Tammie Quinlan
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dione Russell
+0.046better than expected — took 67% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-06 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Austin
−0.017below expectation — took 54% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
Paige Song / Misti Webb
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanessa Landreman
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Lippisch
+0.061better than expected — took 80% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Patty Yamano / Melissa Mullin
2026-04-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mayela Moneo
+0.020better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Perricone
−0.013below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Jennifer Blais / Valorie Tobler
2026-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Austin
+0.006better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Katerina Selland / Hong Lee
2026-03-25 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Borghoff
−0.038below expectation — took 32% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-02-25 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrian Cutolo
−0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.