← Search

Jane Casovan

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
308 matches · 124W–184L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Casovan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history308 matches
L
2026-06-04 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Khelifi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Martinat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-14 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Khelifi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-07 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-16 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-09 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Kuhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-27 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peggy Latour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-05 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Kuhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-27 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-02-26 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Kuhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-01-30 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peggy Latour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-29 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Kuhl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
43.3%
71W–93L · 46.3% of games
6.0
53.8%
21W–18L · 51.1% of games
7.0
30%
30W–70L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
112 matches
#1 Singles
20%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
57 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
35 matches
#2 Singles
7%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe