Search

Jane Casovan

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
308 matches · 124W–184L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
103 of 134
NV · 3.0
129 of 166

Jane is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jane has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.5201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Jane has gone from the 91st to the 4th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
43.3%
71W–93L · 46.3% of games
6.0
53.8%
21W–18L · 51.1% of games
7.0
30%
30W–70L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history308 matches
L
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Khelifi
0.027below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Gina Rivera
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Martinat
+0.010about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Helen McDaniel / Alisia Pulella
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Khelifi
+0.010better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Minette Curnutt / Terry Powers
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Graham
+0.021better than expected — took 42% of games against 36% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Graham
+0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Tina Shirey
2026-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Kuhl
0.020below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Judith Watson / Alex Schrack
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peggy Latour
0.002below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Patricia Davis / Juliann Schnabel
2026-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Kuhl
0.017below expectation — took 8% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Graham
0.015about as expected — took 72% of games against 70% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
Jane Doe / Joan Perricone
2026-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Kuhl
+0.060better than expected — took 39% of games against 21% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peggy Latour
+0.030better than expected — took 33% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Kuhl
0.021below expectation — took 8% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.