Search

Peggy Latour

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
190 matches · 71W–119L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
102 of 134
NV · 3.0
127 of 166

Peggy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Peggy has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Peggy has gone from the 48th to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
22.7%
15W–51L · 38.4% of games
6.0
64.4%
29W–16L · 59% of games
7.0
34.7%
26W–49L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history190 matches
W
Mieko Kitamura / Deborah O'Connor
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karolyn Willoughby
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-6
L
Sheri Cherubino / Juli Kochanski
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sheila Stetts
0.029below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Michelle Alber / Kayleen Krahenbuhl
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Khelifi
0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Jane Hodges / Judy Winreb
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karolyn Willoughby
+0.018about as expected — took 25% of games against 27% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Judith Watson / Alex Schrack
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Casovan
0.002below expectation — took 20% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Michelle Beckwith / Melanie Cortez
2026-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Graham
0.008below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karolyn Willoughby
+0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Robyn Davies / Kathleen Johnson
2026-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Graham
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Carol Rapp / Rae Ann Yost
2026-02-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marie Ramsey
+0.023about as expected — took 33% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Casovan
+0.030better than expected — took 33% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Diane Welch / Margo Milmeister
2026-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Johnson
0.003below expectation — took 0% of games against 18% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Mary Anne van Liere / Diane Schopp
2026-01-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Davis
+0.028better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.