Search

Victoria Khelifi

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
167 matches · 58W–109L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.22
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
96 of 139
NV · 3.5
150 of 228

Victoria is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Victoria has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Victoria has gone from the 18th to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
35.4%
34W–62L · 45.3% of games
7.0
33.8%
24W–47L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history167 matches
L
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Casovan
0.027below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Helen McDaniel / Alisia Pulella
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Casovan
+0.010better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Michelle Alber / Kayleen Krahenbuhl
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Latour
0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Pam Barrie / Stacie Corelle
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Johnson
0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Patricia Delgado / Ginger Nakamura
2025-01-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Cortez
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marie Ramsey
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
Debbie Hicks / Lorry Mazzara
2024-12-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marie Ramsey
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-4
L
Adriana Bhole / Melissa Mullin
2024-11-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marie Ramsey
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Julie MacDonald / Elisabeth Skinner
2024-11-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dorothy Urban
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Joni Kerby / Debbie Hicks
2024-10-31 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lyudmila Kotseva
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-1
L
Billi Dunning / Lori LaBarbera
2024-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marie Ramsey
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-10-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marie Ramsey
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.