Teams

SPANISH TRAIL #1

2024 NTA FALL SENIOR LEAGUE · 7.0 WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-12vs DRAGONRIDGE CCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSheila Stetts / Pamela Rusk vs Krista Kabacy / Joni Kerby3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Khelifi / Marie Ramsey vs Debbie Hicks / Lorry Mazzara1-6, 4-6
2024-11-21vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1Split 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Rusk / Debra Horns vs Katrin Dragnev / Lorraine Yarde4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarie Ramsey / Victoria Khelifi vs Adriana Bhole / Melissa Mullin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-14vs TPCLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Laura Grob / Christina Drees3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-07vs RED ROCK CC #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Merrilu Kutcher / Patti Oakes1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Khelifi / Dorothy Urban vs Julie MacDonald / Elisabeth Skinner6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-31vs DRAGONRIDGE CCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Luann Holmes / Krista Kabacy2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVictoria Khelifi / Lyudmila Kotseva vs Joni Kerby / Debbie Hicks1-6, 1-6
2024-10-17vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Lyudmila Kotseva vs Debi Marimberga / Adriana Bhole6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarie Ramsey / Victoria Khelifi vs Billi Dunning / Lori LaBarbera1-6, 1-6
2024-10-10vs TPCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Pamela Rusk vs Laura Grob / Susan Grady3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVictoria Khelifi / Marie Ramsey vs Christina Drees / Liwei Li3-6, 1-6
2024-10-03vs RED ROCK CC #2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebra Horns / Victoria Khelifi vs Liz Jones / Erin Anderson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #28221928252
2SUN CITY ANTHEM #282201028265
3LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #17116820170
4SUMMERLIN ARBORS7321923233
5RED ROCK CC #155141633263
6SPANISH TRAIL #246151535290
7SUN CITY ANTHEM #146111942295
8RED ROCK CC #235111329212
9SIENA SUMMERLIN28102045305
10SUN CITY SUMMERLIN2882250327
11SPANISH TRAIL #10812347278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Lyudmila Kotseva
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Debra Horns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Pamela Rusk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Victoria Khelifi
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.98
Marie Ramsey
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 3
2.80
Marisa Ptak
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Patricia Boudier
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Carla Kuhl
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Sheila Stetts
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.70
2.67
Peggy Latour
published 3
2.61
Deborah Graham
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3
2.61
Dorothy Urban
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.57
Jane Casovan
usually #3 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyudmila Kotseva + Pamela Rusk3347% games+7.9% vs expected
Patricia Boudier + Marisa Ptak141253% games+6.3% vs expected
Debra Horns + Lyudmila Kotseva3445% games+3.4% vs expected
Lyudmila Kotseva + Marisa Ptak2644% games+2.6% vs expected
Marie Ramsey + Marisa Ptak431259% games+2.4% vs expected
Dorothy Urban + Patricia Boudier91048% games+2.3% vs expected
Lyudmila Kotseva + Victoria Khelifi5748% games+1.1% vs expected
Jane Casovan + Marisa Ptak21043% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lyudmila Kotseva
41W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Debra Horns
40W–72L career · 7 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Pamela Rusk
77W–134L career · 6 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Victoria Khelifi
58W–109L career · 7 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Marie Ramsey
87W–120L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Marisa Ptak
86W–92L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Patricia Boudier
29W–55L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Carla Kuhl
71W–204L career · 12 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Sheila Stetts
100W–207L career · 11 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Karolyn Willoughby
25W–43L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Peggy Latour
71W–119L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Deborah Graham
56W–153L career · 11 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Dorothy Urban
34W–57L career · 7 lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
2.61
3
Jane Casovan
124W–184L career · 9 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.