Search

Debra Horns

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
112 matches · 40W–72L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.10
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
10%
down to 3.0
90%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.12. Higher than today’s 3.10 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
121 of 139
NV · 3.5
203 of 228

Debra is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Debra has been 3.5 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Debra has gone from the 32nd to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
40.9%
27W–39L · 45.8% of games
7.0
28.3%
13W–33L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history112 matches
L
Joan Perricone / Terri Keener
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Schwartz
+0.021better than expected — took 44% of games against 37% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Rusk
0.030below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Michele Howser / Misti Webb
2026-05-27 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cappi Bates
+0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L
Karen Miller / Arlene Babbitt
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Rusk
0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Jennifer Blais / Michelle Simister
2026-05-20 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cappi Bates
0.012about as expected — took 54% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Rusk
+0.009about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Chelsea Gray / Nichole Averett
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandie Mainwal-Price
+0.020better than expected — took 42% of games against 36% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Suni Chabrow / Kelly McPherson
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Rusk
+0.017better than expected — took 65% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Cortez
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Kami Bowler / Gina Case
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Rusk
0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandie Mainwal-Price
0.014below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
Clairen Peeters / Deborah Rogers
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Rusk
+0.008about as expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.