← Search

Kami Bowler

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
192 matches · 92W–100L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
55 of 73
NV · 3.5
172 of 228

Kami is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kami has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Kami has gone from the 64th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
51.2%
86W–82L · 51% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 38.9% of games
7.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history192 matches
L
Hong Lee / Kimberly Lippisch
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherri Jorgensen
−0.024below expectation — took 47% of games against 56% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-05-27 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Shank
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 83% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Minette Curnutt / Terry Powers
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melodee Wilcox
−0.030below expectation — took 43% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Case
+0.002about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lina Kristof
+0.010about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
Karen Miller / Carrie Whipple
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherri Jorgensen
−0.013below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Lisa Winston / Rebecca Geinzer
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melodee Wilcox
−0.013about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Berta-Marie Barocio-Sullivan / Sharyn Gagne
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Case
+0.021better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-15 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lina Kristof
−0.010about as expected — took 75% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Joan Perricone / Jennifer Petrie
2026-04-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melodee Wilcox
−0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melodee Wilcox
−0.019below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Suni Chabrow / Susan Gray
2026-04-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melodee Wilcox
+0.074better than expected — took 86% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.