Search

Rebecca Geinzer

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
153 matches · 84W–69L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.93
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
82%
down to 3.0
18%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 57% down · 43% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.99. Higher than today’s 2.93 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
139 of 139
NV · 3.5
227 of 228

Rebecca is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rebecca has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rebecca has gone from the 74th to the 1st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
56.1%
64W–50L · 52.8% of games
4.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 49.2% of games
7.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history153 matches
L
Anne Alba / Deborah Davis
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Winston
0.008below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Winston
+0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Nancy Holland / Rika Cook
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Winston
0.022below expectation — took 8% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Winston
0.013below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Winston
+0.013about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Winston
+0.012about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Anne Kellogg / Maria Lowry
2026-03-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Oakley
0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Rachel Lamb / Ashley Steffen
2026-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Oakley
0.053below expectation — took 8% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
N/A
2025-09-15 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Stevens
0.007better than expected — took 100% of games against 86% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Merrilu Kutcher
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Dawn Anderson / Shelby McIntyre
2025-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luanne Balelo
+0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 25% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Stevens
0.045below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.