← Search

Gina Case

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
61 matches · 17W–44L · seasons 2025–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.20
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 42 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
47 of 74
NV · 3.5
161 of 235

Gina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gina has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Gina has gone from the 30th to the 18th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
27.1%
13W–35L · 43.8% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 51.4% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 31.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
L
Michele Howser / Mimi Liu
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisun Vehar
+0.043better than expected — took 50% of games against 33% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal LaTour
+0.024better than expected — took 40% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Kelly McPherson / Susan Gray
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andra Starr Scano
−0.022below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Nicole Austin / Vanessa Landreman
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Wogalter
−0.038below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andra Starr Scano
−0.040below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andra Starr Scano
+0.004about as expected — took 47% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Linda Guastella / Adriana Bhole
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Wogalter
+0.024better than expected — took 59% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisun Vehar
−0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Deborah Rogers / Robin Wogalter
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andra Starr Scano
−0.019below expectation — took 40% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
Lorraine Yarde / Lori LaBarbera
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Wogalter
−0.012below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Nancy Holland / Lisa Cook
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisun Vehar
+0.005about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kami Bowler
−0.002about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.