← Search

Tina Nathalia

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
430 matches · 231W–199L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.20
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 66 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
1%
stay 3.0
99%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 20% stay · 80% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.07. Lower than today’s 3.20 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
8 of 134
NV · 3.0
12 of 166

Tina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tina has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Tina has gone from the 8th to the 77th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level10 levels played
2.5
69.6%
32W–14L · 59.7% of games
3.0
59.7%
74W–50L · 54.2% of games
3.5
32.9%
24W–49L · 42.6% of games
4.0
50%
7W–7L · 52.9% of games
5.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 58.1% of games
6.0mixed
52.1%
25W–23L · 51.9% of games
6.5mixed
37.5%
9W–15L · 43.9% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
28W–20L · 54.6% of games
7.5mixed
25%
2W–6L · 38.8% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history430 matches
W
2026-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leticia Schoff
+0.019better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Miguel Calvillo / Maggie Pacholukmixed
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ren Lopez
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Brandynn Elwart / Mary Lindmixed
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeffrey Gobel
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Dan Michalski / Alexandria Changmixed
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeffrey Gobel
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
Diana Vogel / Dhruvan Gopinathchamps
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Teddy Ton
−0.011about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Hugo Olivares-Ponce / Prexy Tamayochamps
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Teddy Ton
+0.043better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Patrik Martinet / Ashley Bryngelsonchamps
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Joseph Engle
+0.021better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
EMELIA ALLEN / Jamie Johnson
2026-07-08 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Palichat
+0.030better than expected — took 61% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Springer
+0.011about as expected — took 55% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Maria Allen / Jeannie Collinschamps
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Springer
−0.016below expectation — took 42% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Kelly Twells / Kari Allen
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ani Zargaryan
−0.003about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Melissa Hicks / Brian Carrollmixed
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brett Wachter
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.