← Search

Tina Nathalia

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
435 matches · 233W–202L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tina Nathalia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history435 matches
L
2026-09-01 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leticia Schoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-30 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sean Ono mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-23 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sean Ono mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-16 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ren Lopez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-05 · LAS VEGAS CC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Knotts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leticia Schoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ren Lopez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeffrey Gobel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeffrey Gobel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Teddy Ton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Teddy Ton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
Patrik Martinet / Ashley Bryngelson
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Joseph Engle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
69.6%
32W–14L · 59.7% of games
3.0
58.3%
81W–58L · 53.9% of games
3.5
33.8%
25W–49L · 43.1% of games
5.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 58.1% of games
6.0mixed
52.1%
25W–23L · 51.9% of games
6.5mixed
37%
10W–17L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
56.9%
29W–22L · 54.1% of games
7.5mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
128 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
121 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
95 matches
#1 Singles
8%
36 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
18 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams