Search

Sean Ono

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
166 matches · 102W–64L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.20
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
101 of 139
NV · 3.5
160 of 228

Sean is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sean has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sean has gone from the 21st to the 37th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
72.1%
62W–24L · 59.7% of games
3.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 48.9% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 69.8% of games
5.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.9% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history166 matches
W
Margot Kelly / David Goetzchamps
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Linda Ono
+0.022better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Kathryn Wilson / Nabil Nassrichamps
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Linda Ono
0.037below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Allen Song / Michael Ivy
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Leavitt
+0.009about as expected — took 55% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Hugo Olivares-Ponce / Prexy Tamayochamps
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · with Venetia Espinueva
0.007below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · with Linda Ono
0.031below expectation — took 41% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Ryan Marchesi / Jeralyn Marchesimixed
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Ono
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.050better than expected — took 100% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Joseph Massie / Kathleen Massiemixed
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Ono
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Hale
0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Norman Wu / Leticia Schoffmixed
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Ono
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Gruner
0.007about as expected — took 57% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Hope Nulf / Julie Schoolmeestermixed
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Ono
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.