← Search

Sara Sager

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 44W–62L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sara Sager to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-09-09 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Ibarguen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-30 · TPC #2 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Norman Wu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · TPC #2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Ibarguen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · TPC #2 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Norman Wu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-05 · TPC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeralyn Marchesi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · TPC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeralyn Marchesi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · TPC #2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Ibarguen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-19 · TPC #2 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shane Gramling mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-08 · TPC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine LaBarre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra VanPaepeghem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with My Vuong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scot Martin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
51.7%
30W–28L · 50.7% of games
4.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 34.1% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.2% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 56.2% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–7L · 27.6% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 30.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert