← Search

Sara Sager

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
101 matches · 42W–59L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.36
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
96%
stay 3.5
4%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.31. Lower than today’s 3.36 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
19 of 73
NV · 3.5
73 of 228

Sara is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sara has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sara has gone from the 36th to the 74th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
52.9%
27W–24L · 50.8% of games
4.0
17.6%
3W–14L · 39% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.2% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 56.2% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–7L · 27.6% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 30.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
W
Mary Ann Apone / Jeannie Collins
2026-07-23 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeralyn Marchesi
−0.025about as expected — took 80% of games against 78% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Nicole Medas / Christi Lin
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Ibarguen
+0.021better than expected — took 65% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Kathryn Wilson / Nabil Nassrimixed
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shane Gramling
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Kim Springer / Leticia Schoff
2026-07-08 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine LaBarre
−0.007about as expected — took 62% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Arika Carrier / Susan Grady
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra VanPaepeghem
−0.011below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with My Vuong
+0.012about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Margaret Bruno / Aleksei Zilbermanmixed
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scot Martin
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Claudia Hernandez / Diane Paull
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Kattau
+0.021better than expected — took 56% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Amy Waters / EMELIA ALLEN
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra VanPaepeghem
−0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Julie Brown / Michael Borensteinmixed
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scot Martin
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra VanPaepeghem
−0.020below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Margaret Bruno / Aleksei Zilbermanmixed
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Ponte
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.