← Search

My Vuong

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2024
99 matches · 63W–36L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
62 of 139
NV · 3.5
96 of 228

My is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

My has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, My has gone from the 4th to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
13W–0L · 71.1% of games
3.0
74.5%
35W–12L · 60.7% of games
3.5
36.1%
13W–23L · 49.2% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rowena Messner
+0.011better than expected — took 58% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Sager
+0.012about as expected — took 44% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Claudia Hernandez / Michelle Jarvis
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vinne Chen
−0.022below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Jamie Kelvington / Lori LaBarbera
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Medas
+0.014about as expected — took 43% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Heidi Thornhill / Denise Mandelbaum
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Medas
+0.037better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Wood
−0.005below expectation — took 35% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Hollander
+0.036better than expected — took 63% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-03-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Protell
−0.029below expectation — took 32% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
2024-03-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andi Berger
+0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-01-20 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.098below expectation — took 0% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 1-0
W
PJ Shouldis / Mimi Fumo
2023-11-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Wood
+0.061better than expected — took 86% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Natasha Kattau / Hannah Tang
2023-10-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vinne Chen
−0.028below expectation — took 43% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.