← Search

Deborah Protell

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
152 matches · 79W–73L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.22
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
95 of 139
NV · 3.5
149 of 228

Deborah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Deborah has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Deborah has gone from the 50th to the 28th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 46.9% of games
3.0
66%
31W–16L · 58.6% of games
3.5
48.8%
41W–43L · 48.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 22.1% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history152 matches
L
Christi Lin / Nicole Reyes
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patti Zack
+0.058better than expected — took 45% of games against 26% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Warrington
−0.034below expectation — took 35% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Arika Carrier / Amanda Gumberg
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Watts
−0.035below expectation — took 8% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Sabine Curtis / Amy Waters
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Hale
+0.016about as expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Tayoni Coleman / Melissa Hicks
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Kellogg
+0.041better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patti Zack
−0.004below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Watts
+0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Warrington
−0.020below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-15 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Zack
−0.057below expectation — took 28% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Anne Gumm / Lori LaBarbera
2026-04-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Warrington
+0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Zack
−0.022below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Zack
+0.029better than expected — took 47% of games against 39% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.