← Search

Lyndsey van der Laan

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
99 matches · 60W–39L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.48
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
59%
stay 3.5
41%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 89% stay · 11% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.40. Lower than today’s 3.48 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
3 of 73
NV · 3.5
24 of 228

Lyndsey is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lyndsey has been 3.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Lyndsey has gone from the 80th to the 76th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
72%
18W–7L · 58.1% of games
3.5
60.9%
39W–25L · 53.9% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 47.6% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 28.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history99 matches
L
Mimi Liu / Alexandra Wysong
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelby McIntyre
−0.040below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Kathleen Chamberlain / Lori LaBarbera
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Whittlesy
+0.035better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Carolyn Wood / Tanya Hale
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darlene Whittlesy
+0.022better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Thornhill
+0.024better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Jules Mitchell
2026-05-16 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.012about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Caroline Walton
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.033below expectation — took 48% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Christina Rich / Laurie Larson
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cherry Lutfi
−0.052below expectation — took 54% of games against 71% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Kathy Ford / Mary Stengel
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Waltman
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darlene Whittlesy
+0.020better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Sarah Perez
2026-04-18 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.043below expectation — took 45% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Amanda Gumberg / Mimi Liu
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Thornhill
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Jules Mitchell
2026-04-11 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.018better than expected — took 57% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.