Search

Jamie Warrington

North Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
284 matches · 167W–117L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.44
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
76%
stay 3.5
24%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.38. Lower than today’s 3.44 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 3.5
42 of 228

Jamie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jamie has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jamie has gone from the 24th to the 32nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
3.0
58.2%
32W–23L · 56.5% of games
3.5
66.7%
68W–34L · 56.8% of games
4.0
42.2%
27W–37L · 47.4% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.7% of games
6.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.4% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 57.9% of games
7.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history284 matches
W
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Watts
+0.010better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Protell
0.034below expectation — took 35% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.005better than expected — took 60% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
Mimi Liu / EMELIA ALLEN
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Kwong-Blais
+0.018better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannan Ohlson
+0.014about as expected — took 41% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Kelly Maier / Terri Andrews
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Prestileo
+0.002about as expected — took 60% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kendalyn Hartsock
0.012about as expected — took 60% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.033below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rozanne Meservey
+0.014better than expected — took 54% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Protell
0.020below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannan Ohlson
0.021below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Amy Cooper / Stella Chivikas
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Castelli
+0.033better than expected — took 65% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.