← Search

Jamie Warrington

North Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
287 matches · 169W–118L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jamie Warrington to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history287 matches
L
2026-09-02 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Travis Azous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Lind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Travis Azous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-20 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Protell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-16 · TPC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-05-13 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Kwong-Blais
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannan Ohlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-04 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqueline Prestileo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-27 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kendalyn Hartsock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · TPC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rozanne Meservey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
58.2%
32W–23L · 56.5% of games
3.5
65.7%
71W–37L · 56.7% of games
4.0
41.7%
25W–35L · 47.1% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.7% of games
6.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.4% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 57.9% of games
7.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
56 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
37 matches
#1 Singles
8%
24 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe