← Search

Betty Hale

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
254 matches · 108W–146L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 38 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
25 of 73
NV · 3.5
85 of 228

Betty is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Betty has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Betty has gone from the 46th to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
51.1%
24W–23L · 50.5% of games
4.0
37.3%
50W–84L · 45.1% of games
4.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 49% of games
7.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 54.4% of games
8.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 47.3% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.2% of games
8.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history254 matches
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Waters
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Josephine McPeak / Anahi Sanchez
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyce Brownridge
−0.011below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Jane Hauck / Deborah Davis
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shiangyuh Wu
+0.008better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Jennifer Hall / Julie Hughes
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Alba
+0.005better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Alba
+0.034better than expected — took 65% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Rebecca Little / Jamaica Tan
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyce Brownridge
−0.009below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Jenny Penesa / Amy Waters
2026-05-04 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beverly Talaat
+0.017better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori LaBarbera
+0.006about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Alba
+0.028better than expected — took 42% of games against 34% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Megan Bender / Christine LaBarre
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shiangyuh Wu
−0.035below expectation — took 47% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Lisa Cook / Nancy Holland
2026-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathie Dye
+0.008about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Dawn Anderson / Lorraine Yarde
2026-04-20 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chrys Smiley
+0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.