← Search

Jane Hauck

LAS VEGAS, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 56W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Hauck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
W
2026-06-18 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-21 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Cortez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-07 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terri Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-16 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Cortez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Patti Oakes / Christine LaBarre
2026-04-09 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-03-12 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Cortez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-05 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terri Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-15 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Cortez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-12-18 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Cortez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-12-04 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terri Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-11-13 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathie Dye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 44.3% of games
4.0
33.3%
26W–52L · 43.4% of games
7.0
60.6%
20W–13L · 55.5% of games
8.0
50%
6W–6L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova