Search

Carol Rapp

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
133 matches · 46W–87L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
62%
down to 3.0
38%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 38% down · 62% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.02. Higher than today’s 2.98 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
72 of 73
NV · 3.5
222 of 228

Carol is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams123 teams · 2001–2026
WHITNEY MESA PARK
2026 Usta Mixed League 40 & Over · MIXED 7.0- 40 & OVER
2026
DTC
2026 Usta Adult League 55 & Over · 7.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER
2026
WHITNEY MESA PARK
2026 Nta Adult 65 & Over League · 7.0 WOMEN
2026
WHITNEY MESA PARK
2025 Usta Mixed League 40 & Over · MIXED 7.0- 40 & OVER
2025
WHITNEY MESA PARK
2025 Nta Adult 65 & Over League · 7.0 WOMEN
2025
WHITNEY MESA PARK
2025 Nta Adult 70 & Over League · 7.0 WOMEN
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Carol has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Carol has gone from the 52nd to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
36%
9W–16L · 45.2% of games
7.0
34.1%
28W–54L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history133 matches
L
Valeria Perdomo / Karen Miller
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
+0.022about as expected — took 38% of games against 33% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Berta-Marie Barocio-Sullivan / Marcela Urcia
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
+0.005about as expected — took 46% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
0.060below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
+0.030better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
+0.006about as expected — took 54% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Minette Curnutt
0.037below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Kimberly Lippisch / Miriam Pasimio
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Minette Curnutt
0.061below expectation — took 20% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Minette Curnutt
0.016below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Patricia Hawkins / Alisia Pulella
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suni Chabrow
0.050below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Julie Sanford-Wible / Jayme Phillips
2026-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Minette Curnutt
0.025below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Marcia Loss / Fay Gallus
2026-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
0.013below expectation — took 42% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Terri Green / Jane Hauck
2026-03-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rae Ann Yost
0.001about as expected — took 40% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.