Search

Fay Gallus

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
102 matches · 60W–42L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.20
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
50 of 73
NV · 3.5
165 of 228

Fay is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Fay has gone from the 38th to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
6.0
75%
24W–8L · 63.1% of games
7.0
51.4%
36W–34L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history102 matches
L
Lisa Cook / Nancy Holland
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Nakamura
0.012below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Kay Patel / Cindi Ray
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruby Leong
0.021below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruby Leong
+0.045better than expected — took 92% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bambi Montag
0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Sabine Curtis / Claudia Hernandez
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bambi Montag
0.033below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Delgado
0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chandra VanPaepeghem
0.054below expectation — took 45% of games against 68% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcia Loss
+0.012better than expected — took 58% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Chevalier
0.035below expectation — took 45% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruby Leong
+0.024better than expected — took 63% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
Joan Perricone / Sally Zimmerman
2026-03-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bambi Montag
+0.007about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Kelly McPherson / Tori Rosenthal
2026-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Nakamura
+0.055better than expected — took 80% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.